Thursday, 21 October 2021

English for Specific Purposes (ESP) and Syllabus Design

 

 

Ph. D Coursework

Paper – 2  Theory  (Language)

                                Assignment



Research Scholar: - Ms. Komal Shahedadpuri
Registration no. :- 2022
Subject: - English
Subject Paper 2:-  Theory (Language)
Topic  English for Specific Purposes (ESP) and Syllabus Design 
Institute: - Department of English, Maharaja Krishnakumarsinhji Bhavnagar University
Guide: - Dr. J K Khuman




Preface

English for Specific Purposes (ESP) is one of the approaches to English language teaching that focuses on the process of learning English language. It is a subset of teaching English as Second or Foreign language. It is usually concerned with teaching English to adult learners (university students) or to the people in professional work situations according to knowledge and the skills they require for specific work context. ESP generally focuses on a specific occupation or profession, such as business English, scientific English, legal English, aviation English, English for medical professionals, English for waiters, English for tourists, English for hotel receptionist etc. It is an approach to work with language in the context that emphasizes on specific linguistic needs of learners. Therefore, the need to understand the requirements of other professions and willingness to adapt to these requirements make teaching English for specific purposes more difficult than teaching English for general purposes. As it requires not only proficiency in the language but also specific knowledge of that discipline or technical field. 

ESP as a learner-centered approach

ESP emphasis on learners' specific linguistic needs and teach accordingly which defines the central position of learners. The key defining feature of ESP is that its teaching and materials are founded on the results of needs analysis of learners. The questions should be asked before teaching ESP course is almost like 

Why do students want to learn English? 

What will be the target situation of language use?

Which skills do they need to master? 

Specific needs of the learners can be identified by examining that situation and the texts (written or spoken) in detail by asking these questions that help to understand context or discourse through target situation analysis and discourse analysis. 

ESP is usually classified into two main branches: English for academic purposes (EAP) and English for occupational/ Vocational purposes (EOP/EVP). In English for academic purposes, English is usually taught in higher education in order to prepare students to use English language  appropriately  for study, like being able to read various reference books or literature available in English and to write in an academic context. While in English for Vocational purposes, English is taught in the context of the trades, various occupations, or professions and investigates how this specialist language is used in real-world contexts. EVP courses are based on the analysis of specific communicative needs of the workplaces. 

Origin of ESP 

ESP has not started as a specific movement but grew out of various emerging trends around the world. It has rapidly developed around the 1970s to be a major part in English language teaching and research. Three main reasons commonly found for the emergence of ESP are as under. 

1.       The demands of Brave New World

The expansion of scientific, technical and economic activity at global level, created the world dominated by two important forces: Technology and Commerce.  Rapid development in these two areas created the need for International language to communicate with people around the world. Due to the economic power of the United States over the world in the post war era English became a global Language. People were crazy about learning English like businessmen who want to do business deals at international level or students who want to study in foreign countries or to read texts in English. Because of this demand, English language teaching became specific in order to fulfil the needs of the people in different contexts. 

2.       A revolution in linguistics

At the same time, when demand for specific English courses grew at international level, new ideas emerged in the study of language. Traditionally the linguists focus on teaching rules, forms or structures like grammar, but focus shifted from formal features of language to the actual use of language in real life communication. With the progress in the areas like science, technology and commerce gave rise to specific focus on the language used in various contexts like English for science and technology, Business English etc. 

“Tell me what you need English for, and I will tell you the English that you need” (Hutchinson and Waters)

This became the guiding principle of ESP that designed their courses by analyzing the individual needs of language learners. 

3.       Focus on the learner

ESP emerged from the new developments in the psychological aspect of learning that emphasize on the importance of learners (student centered) and their attitudes towards the learning language. Through need analysis, it is found that learners have different interests, needs and demands to learn English language. Courses have been designed according to those needs and interests of the learner which increase their motivation to learn language that is an effective factor in teaching and learning of English. 

ESP is centered on the language (grammar, lexis, register), skills (LSRW) discourse and various genres for which it has developed its own approaches, materials and distinctive methodology. 

Development of ESP 

From its early beginning in the 1960s ESP has developed in various phases, now in its fifth phase. 

1.    The register analysis phase - The conception of research

This phase took place in the 1960s and early 1970s, based on the basic principle of different registers. Register is a special variety of language used in various fields, contexts and social settings. Register analysis is an analysis of grammatical and lexical features of the language used for particular purpose and developed from the principle of ESP that English of a specific science differs from each other in terms of its grammatical and lexical features. Then, the syllabus has designed on these linguistic features. Main motive behind this analysis is pedagogic one to make ESP more relevant to learners' needs. 

2.              The rhetorical or discourse analysis - Beyond the sentence 

In this Second Phase, focus shifted on the level above the sentences that focuses on how sentences were combined in discourse to produce meaning. The concern of the research is to identify organizational patterns in the text and then syllabus designed based on these patterns. Teaching materials based on this approach taught students to recognize textual patterns and discourse markers. 

3.              The target situation analysis - The conception of need 

According to Hutchinson and Waters (1987), target situation analysis was aimed to take student’s responses and set it on a more scientific basis by establishing procedures to understand learners’ reasons for learning. This approach helps to design more concrete syllabus based on the needs of various professions in context of communication purposes, setting, the means of communication, language skills, functions, structures, etc.

4.              The concept of authenticity - The skills and strategies

The Fourth Stage has been an effort to look below the surface and consider not language but the thinking process that underlie language use. The principal Idea behind this skill centered approach is underlying all language use, having common reasoning and interpreting processes that enable us to extract meaning from the discourse.  A focus on specific subject registers is unnecessary in this approach because the process is not specific to any register. In terms of its materials this approach generally puts emphasis on listening or reading strategies. 

5.              A Learning - Centered Approach

ESP concerns language learning rather than language use. In the origin of ESP, we can identify three forces characterized as need, new ideas about language and learning. Major concern among these is with language learning and understanding its process. Language learners have their own experiences on how language is learnt. 

 

Syllabus Design 

While teaching English language for various purposes, most of the teachers of English language always think about the different methodologies (methods or approaches) rather than designing concrete/specific syllabus. Because syllabus design has been a challenging job not only for teachers but also for the whole education system today. Syllabus must be framed in an effective way that helps to fulfil the course objectives and intended goals. It should be practical and applicable enough in the real-world scenario that after completion of the course students must be able to meet the demands of the placement. Designing the language syllabus is a very important part of the language course because it should be specifically designed based on What and Why students want to learn language.

According to David Nunan, a syllabus design is concerned with selecting and grading of the content. It is a kind of a roadmap for teachers as well as for the learners which guide them regarding what and how they will learn in a particular course. It provides a basic outline regarding some elements or topics of language that will be covered throughout the course. It also mentions the student learning outcomes or course objectives that students are expected to achieve by the end of the course. 

 

Distinction between the Syllabus and Curriculum 

A syllabus is usually concerned with the ‘content’, (What to teach) that will be dealt in a language course. It is more specific than a curriculum and only one part of it. Content is a single element of the syllabus that includes need analysis, learning objectives for students, what should be the weightage of each topic, how the content will be taught, and how it will be evaluated. Syllabus is simply a statement of what is to be learnt. The curriculum is more general and broader concept than the syllabus. Jack C. Richards is of the opinion that curriculum development in language teaching can be done through seven systematic stages i.e. needs analysis, target situation analysis, planning learning outcomes, course organization, selecting and preparing teaching materials, providing for effective teaching, and evaluation.

 

Some important elements require to design good syllabus

         To study the parameters essential to present day syllabus design (Skill or competency base) 

         To design a need based & job-oriented syllabus for language learners

         Teachers should have liberty to design their own syllabus

         Syllabus should be advanced with updated knowledge about the subject that consider current trends

         It should mention the classroom requirements 

         Need analysis

         It should develop connection between students and teacher

         Logical arrangement of the content in the syllabus

         Selection of resource material and textbooks

         Grading & evaluation

 

Objectives of syllabus design

         To enable a working knowledge of language for the students

         To assist meaningful conversation verbally or non-verbally

         To draft concrete syllabus as one general syllabus can't suffice or cater the needs of all the courses

         To satisfy linguistic needs of the students which are specific and differ from one another (IT, medical, commerce) 

         Due to this multiplicity of needs, syllabus should be precisely structured for specific purposes with aim to overcome linguistics complexities

         Learner should acquire sound knowledge of language and must be able to communicate effectively than just looking at completion of the course

 

On what criteria, syllabus be designed? 

         Language components

         Target situation and needs

         Skill based and practical in nature

         Based on job requirements

         Kind of functions and tasks perform by students

         Focus on specific context, discourse and register of language use

 

Why is the syllabus design more important for ELT courses? 

In India, we have heterogeneous classes of learners from different language backgrounds, cultures and experiences. So, a language teacher requires a proper directional map (syllabus) to teach language to a diversified group of learners according to their actual needs. For this, every teacher should look at syllabus design with utmost importance and seriousness so that it can be effectively implemented in the heterogeneous classroom with indigenous syllabus. Many students have experienced the big gap between what they learn in the classroom and what will be required in the placement.  Thus, the syllabus should be designed in a way that when students go into the market or society, they should not feel that they have not learned what they must deliver in the future. 

 

Role of classroom teacher in syllabus design

Generally, teachers are just the consumers (recipients) of other people's syllabuses and their role is to implement the plans of applied linguists, governing agencies and so on. Very few teachers have the liberty to design their own syllabuses. As they are more aware about the actual needs of the students, set of the topics to discuss in the classroom, level of the students, teachers should be involved in the process of designing language syllabus. Teachers are very important stakeholders in education because they understand how students can acquire skills and knowledge so they can design their syllabus accordingly. Teachers can be active and successful developers of the language syllabus, but they are marginalized as they never asked to participate in the task of syllabus design, even their voice is avoided when they provide some important suggestions. 

 

Models of Syllabus Design

  • Munby’s Needs Analysis Model 

         

Munby’s approach is partly drawn from the socio-linguistic base for designing a syllabus and emphasis on the communicative needs of language learners. It is the most useful model for analyzing linguistic needs to select and include specific language components in the course. Communicative Needs Processor (C. N. P.) is the heart of the model that helps to identify what learners want to do with language. The model includes relevant categories as following,

1.    Purposive Domain - this category helps to identify the specific purpose and type of ESP. e. g. educational: science and technology, communications studies, law, medical etc in Higher Education

2.    Setting - the time and place.  e.g. - lecture rooms, tutorials, seminars, library, laboratories, art rooms, examinations

3.    Interaction - the roles in which the participants will find themselves in terms of status, age group, social relationships etc.  e.g. student relationships: student-student, student-lecturer /tutor/ teacher technician  

4.    Instrumentality: a. medium of communication.

1.    e.g. spoken - receptive and productive

a.     written - receptive and productive.

b.    channel of communication.

2.    e.g. face to face, print, audio-visual

5.    Dialect - the dialects the student will have to understand and produce. e.g. standard American accents and dialects.

6.    Target level - level of linguistic proficiency, different skills may be different. e.g.         ELTS 7 for Law, JMB grade 3 etc.

7.    Communicative event - what the learner will have to do with English. e.g. attend lectures, take part in seminars, write paper, give presentation etc.

8.    Communicative key - the way communication needs to be carried out.  e.g.       formal/informal plus range of attitudes. 

9.    Profile - what the student needs to be able to do.


Bell's Model 

This model offers a first approximation to language teaching syllabus design as shown shown in following diagram

    

                                  


It includes external requirements (of markets) that evaluates errors made by the learners to specify their level in learning process, student's present competence that focus on skills and abilities that learners have and educational philosophy. The main emphasis in the present situation is on the student's present competence which includes needs analysis, skills analysis, and syllabus design. 

Cook's Multi-competence Model


                

Multi-competence considers the ability of a person having knowledge of two or more than two languages in a single mind. It mentions that people who know more than one language have different minds than people who know only one language because it affects the first language and way of thinking of the people. These multicompetent individuals should be called "L2 '' rather than 'second language learners' because they are learning a new language (native speakers are not considered as first language learners).  The aim of L2 learning should be to become a multi competent user of more than one language, and not imitate the native speaker of that language. Cook has argued with evidence that knowledge of more than one language can change the way people think. (Vivian Cook (linguist))

 

Importance of syllabus design in English for specific purposes

 

'I keep six honest serving-men

(They taught me all I knew);

Their names are What and Why and When

And How and Where and Who'

                                                               (Rudyard Kipling) 


Syllabus design has an important role in ESP courses as it is designed to meet the specific requirements of the market. ESP syllabus (course) should be designed carefully because it enables learners to perform specific tasks. To design an EPS course, we need to ask questions in order to understand the reasons why students want to learn English.  Above mentioned lines indicated the need to ask questions for detailed information and clarification regarding objectives behind learning English.  Kipling’s ‘six honest serving men' can help us to outline the basic questions like 

  

           

 

Why do students need to learn English? (Purpose) 

Who is going to be involved in the learning process? (Teachers, students) 

Where and when learning takes place? (Target situation) 

What does the student need to learn?  (Language aspects) 

How does learning happen?  (Methodology) 

 

To know the answers to these questions, needs analysis can be used as an approach to design a specific syllabus as it is the main cornerstone in the procedure of ESP syllabus design. Professionalism, Practicality and Specialization are three key words of major focus in teaching English for specific purposes. These keywords should be taken into consideration while designing various ESP syllabuses which suits various professions in which students want to pursue their career, secondly it should be practical and applicable enough that will help the students to acquire skills and knowledge required in that field and third thing that syllabus should be more specific to learners as general syllabus can't satisfy heterogeneous learners. Vocabulary, register, discourse, context are distinctive elements found in different ESP courses like business, science and technology, engineering and so on. These elements of language should be taken into consideration in designing concrete syllabus. There are various approaches for teaching English language but for teaching English for specific purposes the most appropriate and used approach today is the Communicative or Functional approach that deals with various functions or purposes for which learners use English. For example, the English for the functions like to greet, ask, suggest, complain and so on. Similarly, English used in various professions is quite different for the people in hotel management, tourism, journalism, mass communication and many others. These all professions used a distinct form of English that is unique in discourse, context, register and lexis. 

Conclusion

Thus, syllabus design is a very important part or stage in designing any language courses which generally preceded by need analysis which is the base or important pillar on which ESP syllabus is designed to fulfil expectations of the market as well as learners. So, ESP syllabus should be carefully designed with the valuable contribution and participation of classroom language teachers as they are more aware about learners, their attitudes, level of understanding, strengths and weaknesses in language components and their future communicative needs. 

 

References

 

Bell, Roger T. An Introduction to Applied Linguistics. New York : St. Martin's Press, 1981.

Gillett, A J. "Designing an EAP Syllabus: English Language Support for Further and Higher Education." Journal of Further and Higher Education (1989): 92-104.

Hutchinson, Tom and Alan Waters. English for Specific Purposes : A learning-centered approach. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1987.

Nunan, David. Syllabus Design. Ed. C N Candlin and H G Widdowson. Oxford University Press, 1988.

Paltridge, Brian and Sue Starfield, The Handbook of English for Specific Purposes. Wiley-Blackwell : A John Wiley & Sons, 2013.

Raza, Asif Ali. "Esp syllabus." n.d. SlideShare. <https://www.slideshare.net/AsifAliRaza/esp-syllabus>.

"Vivian Cook (linguist)." n.d. Wikipedia. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vivian_Cook_(linguist)>.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

No comments:

Post a Comment